web analytics

A federal judge just remanded a wage-and-hour case, and used two Simpsons references to do it. That’s enough to embiggen my blogging motivation.

This post was originally published on this site

T

his isn’t just a cromulent decision—it’s a reminder that attorneys’ fees can’t be used to shoehorn a small state wage claim

into

federal court. TL;DR: A federal judge in Pennsylvania kicked a wage-and-hour case back to state court after finding that the employer couldn’t show more than $75,000 was at stake. The plaintiff’s actual damages were just $9,350, and the court concluded that attorneys’ fees of $65,650—required to cross the jurisdictional threshold—wouldn’t be “reasonable” under state law. Bonus: the opinion featu

r

es not one, but two references

to The Simpsons. 📄 Read the full opinion here The Facts: Clocking In, Walking

Read Complete Article

See also  The $101K Lesson: A Salary Alone Doesn’t Buy You an Exemption
,

Get the Latest HR Headlines

* indicates required

HR NEWS MARKETPLACE


»See how your employer brand stacks up against the competition with CLEO Ai


»Free CRM Audit from Dalia


»Cliquify + Top Employers Institute 2025 Employer Brand Priorities Report


»Diversity and Inclusion Job Board


»RecTech PR Newswire


»Job Board Directory


»Optimize Your Recruitment Marketing with Jobsync


»Recruiting Newsletters


»HR Tech News


»Jobs with Relocation Assistance


»Recruiter Ebooks