web analytics

A federal judge just remanded a wage-and-hour case, and used two Simpsons references to do it. That’s enough to embiggen my blogging motivation.

This post was originally published on this site

T

his isn’t just a cromulent decision—it’s a reminder that attorneys’ fees can’t be used to shoehorn a small state wage claim

into

federal court. TL;DR: A federal judge in Pennsylvania kicked a wage-and-hour case back to state court after finding that the employer couldn’t show more than $75,000 was at stake. The plaintiff’s actual damages were just $9,350, and the court concluded that attorneys’ fees of $65,650—required to cross the jurisdictional threshold—wouldn’t be “reasonable” under state law. Bonus: the opinion featu

r

es not one, but two references

to The Simpsons. 📄 Read the full opinion here The Facts: Clocking In, Walking

Read Complete Article

See also  New DOL Guidance Hits Pause and Rewind on Independent Contractor Crackdown
,

Get the Latest HR Headlines

* indicates required

HR NEWS MARKETPLACE


»See how your employer brand stacks up against the competition with CLEO Ai


»Free CRM Audit from Dalia


»Cliquify + Top Employers Institute 2025 Employer Brand Priorities Report


»Diversity and Inclusion Job Board


»RecTech PR Newswire


»Job Board Directory


»Recruiting Newsletters


»HR Tech News


»Jobs with Relocation Assistance


»Recruiter Ebooks