This post was originally published on this site
S
everal readers of this blog have floated the idea that Muldrow v. City of St. Louis — the Supreme Court’s recalibration of what counts as actionable harm in discrimination cases — might ripple into harassment standards. One federal appellate court recently explained why it
d
oesn’t. TL;DR: The Tenth Circuit held that Muldrow v. City of St. Louis is a discrete-act decision and declined to extend it to hostile work environment claims. Harassment claims still require conduct that is sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions
o
f employment. ðŸ“
32;Read the Tenth Circuit opinion The Run-Up
to a Hostile Environment Claim