Latest News
POV: Your Boss Just Followed you on Social Media #shorts
The Customer Isn’t Always Right. Sometimes Great Managers Tell Them to Leave
Can Refusing a Settlement Meeting Support a Retaliation Claim?
A boss wanted to discuss settling an employee’s harassment claims without lawyers present. That invitation came with more baggage than the calendar entry suggested. TL;DR: The Second Circuit revived an employee’s retaliation claims after finding that her refusal to discuss settlement plausibly communicated continued opposition to discrimination. She still has
Quality Time with Mick Investigates True Crime
When ADA and Harassment Clash
Maybe Don’t Ask ChatGPT How to Make Emails Disappear During Litigation
There are probably better things to ask ChatGPT during litigation than how quickly permanently deleted emails disappear. Especially when the other side is looking for those emails. TL;DR: A former employee denied signing a non-solicitation and confidentiality agreement. A forensic examination later uncovered ChatGPT searches about permanently deleted Yahoo emails.
21+ HR Rules and Regulations Your HR Team Needs To Know
Taking the Fear Out of Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs)
7 Lessons Every HR Leader Should Take Into 2027
Greetings From Mexico. About That Sick-Leave Policy…
A Mexico vacation while on sick leave is an easy headline. The employer’s defense required a closer look at two separate decisions. TL;DR: A police department defeated discrimination, accommodation, and retaliation claims brought by an officer demoted for violating its sick-leave policy and later discharged because she could not perform
Ep177: What does real and successful DEI look like?
Why Your Team Won’t Give You the Real Feedback, with Tanya Uyigue
Which Employment Laws Apply to Your Organization: A Guide by Employee Count, Location, Industry, and Growth Stage
Easiest E-Learning Authoring Tools for HR and L&D Teams
A Changing Termination Explanation Didn’t Sink This Employer’s Defense.
A termination letter can become a vocabulary quiz once litigation starts. Every changed adjective gets its own exhibit. TL;DR: An employer defeated race and age discrimination claims because its explanations consistently described the same policy violations. Differences in wording and minor factual discrepancies did not show that the stated reason







