Author: Brad Dixon
Easiest E-Learning Authoring Tools for HR and L&D Teams
A Changing Termination Explanation Didn’t Sink This Employer’s Defense.
A termination letter can become a vocabulary quiz once litigation starts. Every changed adjective gets its own exhibit. TL;DR: An employer defeated race and age discrimination claims because its explanations consistently described the same policy violations. Differences in wording and minor factual discrepancies did not show that the stated reason
Celebrate 20 years with me (bring your detective skills)
How To Support Mental Health in the Workplace: 7 Steps HR Can Take
A Hiring Manager Called a Candidate ‘Too Stupid to Work Here.’ The Real Failure Wasn’t the Candidate
Allow Me to Reintroduce Myself
My name is Eric Meyer, a founding partner at Pierson Ferdinand LLP. You may know me as the guy who turns someone else’s workplace disaster into your morning reading. If you’ve ever read a post here and thought, “Please tell me our managers aren’t doing that,” we’re practically kindred spirits
18 Types of Employee Benefits HR Should Know [2026]
Q&A With Angie Cartwright, VP of People Experience, University Co-op
The HR Dialogues #50 | CHRO of the Future: From HR Leader to Work Architect
HR Manager Certification Online: Which One Should You Get First?
The Most Dangerous Thing a New Manager Can Say Is ‘I’ll Fix This’
The EEOC’s Anti-American Discrimination Priority Gets a Red-Highlighted Example
If you want the EEOC’s attention, do this: send an email — in red highlight — seeking “ONLY H1B” applicants. It’s one of the allegations in a new federal lawsuit, part of the agency’s push against anti-American bias. TL;DR: The EEOC sued an IT staffing agency under Title VII, alleging
30 Strong Work Ethic Examples [+ Poor Behaviors To Look Out For]
Can a Paid Suspension Trigger a Sex Bias Verdict? This One Did.
The university kept paying its softball coach during an investigation. Its no-contact order also stopped her from teaching, and the suspension became a $300,000 sex bias judgment. TL;DR: A jury found sex motivated a university’s paid suspension of its women’s softball coach, and an appeals court upheld the $300,000 judgment.





